I recently came across an interesting article about a project who's subject matter had to do with the idea of global consciousness. What is this global consciousness we ask ourselves? the origins of the theory and idea of global consciousness, as I understand them, ring back to a man named Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a french paleontologist who developed the idea of omega point and more importantly the noosphere, there are several major contributors to the theory but Pierre was one of the most important, the actual nature of global consciousness and its roots go back to the times of socrates and plato though, largely having to do with concepts and idea's of posthumanitism, in reference to metaphysics, developed in their time, and other things to that effect, In any case. Global consciousness is the idea that we as human beings make up a huge network of consciousness that exists within all of us, and that we are all connected through our minds, someway on a conscious, rational level. Think of the human body, now think of every single cell in the human body as being a rational, individual human beings, we all make up this large body of consciousness, contrary to our normal anatomical structure where every single cell in our body is dominated and controlled by a singular consciousness we refer to as the mind, however it is unclear as to whether our mind is in fact, a singular consciousness, the subject of collective cellular consciousness and cellular memory will be examined later on in other entries. The global consciousness project aims to try and prove the relation of all human beings on a conscious level via the use of random number generators following a path of coherence and attempting to show the relation between human beings when the number generators wouldn't follow their path of coherence during an event such as the twin tower bombings or the massive sri lankan tsunami, of course there are also reasonable explanations of how the number generators did what they did, but isn't it a coincidence that the number generators did that at the times of major world events? how in theory and potential fact, that we as human beings have an effect, or rather, can cause manifestations in different forms such as wishes coming true, natural events, in reality and in the physical world in the form of natural events, in the form of wishes coming true, through our thinking, through our feelings, through our ups and downs and all arounds, that we as human beings are capable of much more together then we are apart. the project itself was only designed to provide potential evidence that humans were in fact connected either locally or non locally, it wasn't designed with the idea in mind that human beings have potential to physically manifest feelings and ideas, as fore stated. to measure the extent of the kind of changes we could manifest in the world, although there are theories, in relation to the fore stated idea that human beings can physically manifest ideas and feelings, that present the idea that things like global warming are a manifestation and product of something happening within global consciousness, of course there are perfectly logical explanations for global warming but as before, the coincidental value and chance this has is interesting. when were thinking of ancient cultures such as the maya, the various aboriginal tribes of north america and the various tribes of africa, we think primitive peoples, people stuck in the past, when really, they may have a greater knowledge of global consciousness then the rest of us. In the books 2012: the return of quetzalquoatl and breaking open the head, Daniel Pinchbeck objectively describes his accounts with all these various tribes, in particular, the ceremony of rain dance. He recalled a day when he was with the bwiti tribe of the congo, where they performed a rain dance in clear vibrant sunshine and daylight, and half an hour later clouds had rolled in and it began to rain. of course, logical explanation for this, but seeing as the bwiti don't have access to media internet or newspapers with weather forecasts and rain comes half an hour after they start a raindance, the nature of it all is very peculiar and very coincidental, but on the other hand could be an account and recording of how a collection of consciousness comes together with a common goal to physically manifest an idea or wish, quite literally manipulates nature to cause rainfall. My take on this, all of this, I'm by nature a skeptic, however I don't feel I possess the ultimate bias a full skeptic possesses, or rather, approaching an idea or theory with total bias, just out to sully and undermine for the sake of feeling superior, for feeling like a big shot, an intellectual bully. I like to think I approach a situation with optimism but not without a proper gauge of skepticism, I ask critical and bold questions that challenge the foundations and building blocks of an idea or theory, not in an attempt to decimate and take down an idea but to point out structural inefficiencies of it and to suggest where improvments and revisions should and must be made, in any case, my opinion on all of this. It strikes me as interesting that although there are logical explanations for the events in which the random number generators didn't follow their path of coherence due to anomalies and things to that effect, it is none the less vital that more research be done into applicable control methods to really determine if it truely was collective human consciousness that caused the number generators to have non coherence, or whether it was really all anomalies, more study and research should also be done into matter and energy manipulation through the mind of individuals and of collective individuals, if anyone has any book or website recommendations they would be very appreciated and my deepest gratitude would be expressed towards you. please reply back to me, to express your opinion, to please point out flaws and mistakes I have made (not grammatical I meant in the form of information, if I have my information wrong) always look for answers, always keep thinking.
references
http://noosphere.princeton.edu/
breaking open the head by daniel pinchbeck
2012:the return of quetzalcoatl by danial pinchbeck
wikipedia search of Pierre Teilhard de chardin with external links and references to disclaim any non accountable facts.
No comments:
Post a Comment